Re: [2.6 patch] let X86_VOYAGER depend on SMP

From: James Bottomley
Date: Thu Apr 27 2006 - 19:07:55 EST


On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was kinda waiting for James to express an opinion. In theory it'd be
> better to make uniproc-on-Voyager build, boot and run like the wind.

I do have making uniprocessor build work on my todo list. There are
actually a surprising number of non-smp machines out their (mainly
3360s).

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/