Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:48:06 EST


Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Unless one considers
> > UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)
>
> Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple
> times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of
> all the conflicts we (me and Jeff) would get with patches in our queues.

Lindent doesn't do a terribly good job, and one ends up having to perform a
lot of manual fixups. Perhaps as many as are presently needed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/