Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 2 May 2006 16:42:16 -0400
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Yes, it would need to to be a new type - resource_addr_t, perhaps.
> > 
> 
> How about "res_sz_t".

resource_size_t, please.

> "resource_addr_t" probably is not a very appropriate
> keyword as at lots of places we also need to represent size and alignment
> with this typedef.

OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/