Re: Linux 2.6.16.14

[Patrick McFarland]

On Thursday 04 May 2006 23:18, Ioan Ionita wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > :) Tongue was firmly in cheek. I guess I should have said more initially.
> > : It
> >
> > wasn't so much the patch, as the speed with which they're coming. It
> > makes me (at least) feel like the stable series is unstable. Couldn't you
> > store them up for a day or two at a time (unless of course they really
> > are that important that they require a quicker cycle).
>
> I'm sure that they would be stored till Tuesdays if the linux kernel
> had a PR department...

Thank $DIETY that Linux isn't an end-user product, then. (Then again, even 
FOSS end-user products have been known to tell their PR people to stuff 
it...)

-- 
Patrick McFarland || www.AdAstraPerAspera.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids,
we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and
listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo,
Inc, 1989

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/