Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations

[David Howells]

Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Either way, it will use more stack; the mere fact that whilst it's using the
> > value, the compiler may stash it in a register is irrelevant.
> 
> Is the stack usage very close to exceeding 4 KB?  Could saving one more
> pointer on the stack cause a problem?

I suspect you don't know since it's a stacked filesystem.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/