Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 20:25 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > No - it would only make sense if it could be used for all slabs. 
> > Otherwise: How should kfree figure out if it's called for a slab with 
> > embedded pointers or not?

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 22:05 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> We certainly can support both by virtualizing kfree() and
> kmem_cache_free() with struct slab_operations type of thing

Uhm, not for kfree(), obviously. I was thinking of kmem_cache_free().

			Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/