Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sat May 13 2006 - 12:43:16 EST


On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Careful, rt21 has a bug slipped in that might have funny results on SMP
> machines:
>
> + if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> + set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
>
> John (although he later fixed it) added a ; after the if. But the fix is
> not yet in Ingo's patch.

I saw that go by, and fixed it before building. Mine is a UP build
anyway.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/