Re: [PATCH] unnecessary long index i in sched

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> >
> >Unless we expect to have more than 4294967295 CPUs, there's no reason to
> >have 'i' as a long long here.
> >
> If declaring it as int, your number should read as 2147483647. :)
>

You know that as soon as I sent this email, I knew some wise ass was going
to respond with that!

;)

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/