Re: [PATCH 5/6] Have ia64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 10:03:08 EST
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Size zones and holes in an architecture independent manner for ia64.
This one makes my ia64 die very early in boot. The trace is pretty useless.
config at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/config-ia64
An indirect fix for this has been set out with a patchset with the subject
"[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for node alignment and flatmem assumptions" . For
arch-independent-zone-sizing, the issue was that FLATMEM assumes that
NODE_DATA(0)->node_start_pfn == 0. This is not the case with
arch-independent-zone-sizing and IA64. With arch-independent-zone-sizing,
a nodes node_start_pfn will be at the first valid PFN.
Note the misaligned pfns.
You will still get the message about misaligned PFNs on IA64. This is
because the lowest zone starts at the lowest available PFN which may not
be 0 or any other aligned number. It shouldn't make a different - or at
least I couldn't cause any problems.
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/