Re: [PATCH 5/6] Have ia64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 10:03:08 EST

On Sun, 14 May 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Size zones and holes in an architecture independent manner for ia64.

This one makes my ia64 die very early in boot. The trace is pretty useless.

config at

An indirect fix for this has been set out with a patchset with the subject "[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for node alignment and flatmem assumptions" . For arch-independent-zone-sizing, the issue was that FLATMEM assumes that NODE_DATA(0)->node_start_pfn == 0. This is not the case with arch-independent-zone-sizing and IA64. With arch-independent-zone-sizing, a nodes node_start_pfn will be at the first valid PFN.

<log snipped>

Note the misaligned pfns.

You will still get the message about misaligned PFNs on IA64. This is because the lowest zone starts at the lowest available PFN which may not be 0 or any other aligned number. It shouldn't make a different - or at least I couldn't cause any problems.

Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at