Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 11:13:53 EST
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> let me
> give a simple example here:
Examples are useful.
> "pid virtualization"
> - Linux-VServer doesn't really need that right now.
> we are perfectly fine with "pid isolation" here, we
> only "virtualize" the init pid to make pstree happy
> - Snapshot/Restart and Migration will require "full"
> pid virtualization (that's where Eric and OpenVZ
> are heading towards)
snapshot/restart/migration worry me. If they require complete
serialisation of complex kernel data structures then we have a problem,
because it means that any time anyone changes such a structure they need to
update (and test) the serialisation.
This may be a show-stopper, in which case maybe we only need to virtualise
> - OpenSSI and *Mosix require system wide pid spaces
> which probably could be implemented with virtual
> pid spaces as well
> - many security addons provide something called pid
> randomization, and I think they could probably
> benefit from a virtual pid space, too
Anyway. Thanks, guys. It sound like most of this work will be nicely
separable so we can think about each bit as it comes along.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/