mel@xxxxxxxxx (Mel Gorman) wrote:
I am struggling to see how the alignment patches or
arch-independent-zone-sizing would clobber the mapping of the ACPI table :(
hm. Well something did it ;)
> I also managed to provoke "Too many memory regions,
> truncating" out of it.
"Too many memory regions, truncating" is of concern because memory will be
effectively lost. Is this on x86_64 as well? If so, I need to submit a
patch that sets CONFIG_MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS to 128 on x86_64 which is the
same value of E820MAX. This is similar to what PPC64 does for LMB regions
(see MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS in arch/powerpc/Kconfig for example). If it's not
x86_64, what arch does it occur on?
Yes, it's x86_64. It kind of went away though. I seem to have been
finding various .config combinations which cause x86_64 to die horridly -
that was one.