Re: dev_printk output

From: James Bottomley
Date: Sat May 20 2006 - 09:46:34 EST

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 22:55 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as
> drivers
> are loaded. I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be
> on a bus. The only example I have of devices not-on-a-bus are scsi
> targets. I would propose introducing a new scsi_target bus for them,
> then removing the 'target' from the start of the bus_id. Adding them
> to
> the scsi bus looks like it'd be a lot of work.

It's not just the target. All the intermediate devices in transport
classes don't have busses either. The only reason scsi_device has a
bus is so we can use the driver model to bind the ULDs.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at