Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun May 21 2006 - 19:03:16 EST
On Pá 19-05-06 08:13:34, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > let me
> > give a simple example here:
> Examples are useful.
> > "pid virtualization"
> > - Linux-VServer doesn't really need that right now.
> > we are perfectly fine with "pid isolation" here, we
> > only "virtualize" the init pid to make pstree happy
> > - Snapshot/Restart and Migration will require "full"
> > pid virtualization (that's where Eric and OpenVZ
> > are heading towards)
> snapshot/restart/migration worry me. If they require complete
> serialisation of complex kernel data structures then we have a problem,
> because it means that any time anyone changes such a structure they need to
> update (and test) the serialisation.
> This may be a show-stopper, in which case maybe we only need to virtualise
> pid #1.
Well, if pid #1 virtualization is only needed for pstree, we may want
to fix pstree instead :-).
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/