Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > On Monday 22 May 2006 00:28, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > > 
 > >  > >  > You make a good point.  In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
 > >  > >  > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
 > >  > >  > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.
 > >  > 
 > >  > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
 > >  > that can be triggered by everybody.
 > > 
 > > Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.
 > 
 > Yes let's remove all that kernel debugging support. It is totally useless
 > for most users, isn't it?

If a regular user can trip up debugging printks, yes, lets remove it.
Examples ?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/