Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
From: Dave Jones
Date: Sun May 21 2006 - 19:48:10 EST
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 00:28, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > You make a good point. In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
> > > > > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
> > > > > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.
> > >
> > > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
> > > that can be triggered by everybody.
> > Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.
> Yes let's remove all that kernel debugging support. It is totally useless
> for most users, isn't it?
If a regular user can trip up debugging printks, yes, lets remove it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/