Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

From: David S. Miller
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 03:08:04 EST

From: Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200

> So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...

Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
up somehow.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at