Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)

From: Paul P Komkoff Jr
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 16:20:34 EST

Replying to Vlad Yasevich:
> /* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000
> * VJ compression implementations. If the ID field
> * does not change, they drop every other packet in
> * a TCP stream using header compression.
> */

Unfortunately, cisco IOS also complains that packets are "duplicate".
And, regarding to your previous message on how to fix this - IIRC, if
I do connect() on this socket, it will refuse to receive datagrams
from hosts other than specified in connect(), and I will be unable to
bind another socket to the same port on my side.

That said, the only solution which is close to what been before, will
be to keep one socket for receive, and create socket for each router I
am communicating with, right?

Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // <- my pgp key
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at