Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists.

[Balbir Singh]

> I thought you were referring to shrink_dcache_parent(). At least, I
> was, and the hunk of diff that your comment followed after was from
> select_parent(). Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we're
> agreeing that it's doing the right thing in select_parent().
> 
> The modified shrink_dcache_sb() doesn't do do any list moving at all,
> it simply frees all the dentries on the superblock in a single pass.....

I think I misread the code, I thought I was still at an older
function.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> R&D Software Enginner
> SGI Australian Software Group

-- 

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/