Re: [patch 03/11] input: new force feedback interface

[Andrew Morton]

Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 
> Andrew, did you get my response?

Nope.

> I received Delivery Status Notification
> for your address:
> <copy>
> - These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
> akpm@xxxxxxxx; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system status)
> 
>     Remote MTA smtp.osdl.org: network error
> 
> 
>  - SMTP protocol diagnostic: 554 5.7.1 gmail.com suggested we reject
> your email: 81.228.11.120 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of
> anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxx
> </paste>
> 

Appropriate people have been informed ;)

> 
> > 
> > BTW, what is the best way to send corrected patches for this patchset?
> > Probably as a reply to the individual patches?
> > 
> 
> Hmm, I think it is easier to just send the whole updated set...
> 
> I'm going to do all the changes discussed and then send the set probably
> tomorrow or in the weekend.
> 

Yes, that's fine.  Once patches have matured a bit, incremental (and
fine-grained) updates are preferred.  And I'll often turn
wholesale-replacement-attempts into incremental updates, so we can see what
changed.

But at this stage, rip-it-out-and-redo is fine.  Although it does help if
you can tell us which of the review comments were and were not implemented,
so we don't have to re-read the whole thing with the same level of
attention.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/