Re: [PATCH 6/6] reliable stack trace support (i386 entry.Sannotations)

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> 25.05.06 07:23 >>>
>"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  #define SAVE_ALL \
>>   	cld; \
>>   	pushl %es; \
>>  +	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4;\
>>  +	/*CFI_REL_OFFSET es, 0;*/\
>>   	pushl %ds; \
>
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Warning: rest of line ignored; first ignored character is `4'
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc
>
>etcetera.  And
>
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: no such instruction: `eax,0'
>arch/i386/kernel/entry.S:757: Error: no such instruction: `ebp,0'
>
>
>bix:/usr/src/25> as --version
>GNU assembler 2.14.90.0.6 20030820

Still doesn't make sense to me, assuming the merge didn't corrupt anything. The oldest assembler I'm using is
2.15.90.0.1.1, but as said before your assembler clearly also supports .cfi_*. Any chance I could see the offending
entry.S?

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/