Re: [PATCH 00/33] Adaptive read-ahead V12

[Diego Calleja]

El Sat, 27 May 2006 10:08:41 +1000,
Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:00, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Sorry I should have been clearer. The belief is that certain infrastructure 
> components do not benefit from a pluggable framework, and readeahead probably 
> comes under that description. It's not like Linus was implying we should only 
> have one filesystem for example, since filesystems are afterall pluggable 
> features.

That leaves another question that I (a poor user) may have missed: Why is
adaptive read-ahead compile-time configurable instead of completely replacing
the old system?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/