Re: [patch 51/61] lock validator: special locking: sock_lock_init()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon May 29 2006 - 21:34:54 EST


On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:27:14 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>
> teach special (multi-initialized, per-address-family) locking code to the
> lock validator. Has no effect on non-lockdep kernels.
>
> Index: linux/include/net/sock.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/net/sock.h
> +++ linux/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -81,12 +81,6 @@ typedef struct {
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> } socket_lock_t;
>
> -#define sock_lock_init(__sk) \
> -do { spin_lock_init(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)); \
> - (__sk)->sk_lock.owner = NULL; \
> - init_waitqueue_head(&((__sk)->sk_lock.wq)); \
> -} while(0)
> -
> struct sock;
> struct proto;
>
> Index: linux/net/core/sock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/net/core/sock.c
> +++ linux/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,27 @@ lenout:
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Each address family might have different locking rules, so we have
> + * one slock key per address family:
> + */
> +static struct lockdep_type_key af_family_keys[AF_MAX];
> +
> +static void noinline sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init_key(&sk->sk_lock.slock, af_family_keys + sk->sk_family);
> + sk->sk_lock.owner = NULL;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&sk->sk_lock.wq);
> +}

OK, no code outside net/core/sock.c uses sock_lock_init().

Hopefully the same is true of out-of-tree code...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/