Re: [patch 06/61] lock validator: add __module_address() method

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 18:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> 
> I'd suggest that __module_address() should do the same thing, from an API neatness
> POV.  Although perhaps that's mot very useful if we didn't take a ref on the returned
> object (but module_text_address() doesn't either).
> 
> Also, the name's a bit misleading - it sounds like it returns the address
> of a module or something.  __module_any_address() would be better, perhaps?

How about __valid_module_address()  so that it describes exactly what it
is doing. Or __module_address_valid().

-- Steve

> 
> Also, how come this doesn't need modlist_lock()?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/