Re: [PATCH] klibc
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 18:45:03 EST
maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
+ !defined(__powerpc64__)
Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
_BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some
64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today.
-hpa
indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.
-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)
is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.
__arch64__ is ugly; it doesn't say it's a sparc thing. I have added
-D__sparc_v9__ to the sparc64 MCONFIG file, so I think that's fine.
Perhaps the right thing to do is to make this an archconfig.h configurable.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/