Re: [patch, -rc5-mm3] fix irqpoll some more

[Ingo Molnar]

* Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Unfortunately we've got a load of handlers that just blindly say "Yes 
> I handled something" so they bogusly cause completion to be assumed.
> 
> We'd actually have to know if the IRQ source had "gone away" on the 
> chip I fear.

ok. Then lets keep what we have right now, and first do the 
disable/enable_irq_handler() API, and once the commonly used drivers are 
covered by the new disable/enable API, apply the unconditional 
desc->depth check to irqpoll?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/