Re: genirq

[Ingo Molnar]

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are 
> > rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers 
> > of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and 
> > ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are 
> > not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their 
> > __do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in 
> > 2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq)
> 
> There was a problem reported by Kevin Hillman , the -v5 version was 
> not functional on ARM omap boards .. Was that handled already in -v6?

Daniel - you should be aware that the -mm genirq lineup does _not_ 
include the ARM bits. Those changes go via the normal ARM QA and merge 
path, i.e. via rmk. The -mm lineup only includes the generic bits (for 
type-based platforms). In any case, they dont impact upstream genirq 
merging plans.

(The omap thing in the armirq queue is likely some small thing. Thomas 
is checking it.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/