Re: [PATCH 5/5] VT binding: Add new doc file describing the feature

From: Jon Smirl
Date: Sat Jun 10 2006 - 21:10:30 EST


On 6/10/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/10/06, Antonino A. Daplas <adaplas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I see now that you can have tty0-7 assigned to a different console
> > driver than tty8-63.
> > Why do I want to do this?
>
> Multi-head. I can have vgacon on the primary card for tty0-7,
> fbcon on the secondary card for tty8-16.

That's what I thought, I couldn't see any other reason. The kernel
doesn't support input from multiple users so multihead can only be
used by a single user.

Does anyone use single user multihead on current systems? The kernel
doesn't have code in it to initialize secondary VGA cards. What modern
non-VGA hardware does this work on?

The kernel is also missing the logic for controlling which VGA card is
active when multiple ones exist in the same box.

If this feature doesn't work on current hardware, could it be dropped?
It would make binding to the vt system much simpler if only one driver
could be bound at a time. Anything we do to make that system simpler
would benefit everyone.

When I say dropped, I mean drop the feature of having multiple drivers
simultaneously open by the VT layer. You would still be able to switch
from vgacon to fbcon by using sysfs. You just wouldn't be able to use
VT swap hotkeys between them.

At some future point I would like to explore pushing the VT system out
to user space where it becomes much easier to make it multi-user and
multi-head. If you do that, something like a single user, in-kernel
system management console makes more sense.

--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx


--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/