Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3-lockdep -

[David Miller]

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:38:07 +0200

> yeah. I'll investigate - it's quite likely that sk_receive_queue.lock 
> will have to get per-address family locking rules - right?

That's right.

> Maybe it's enough to introduce a separate key for AF_UNIX alone (and 
> still having all other protocols share the locking rules for 
> sk_receive_queue.lock) , by reinitializing its spinlock after 
> sock_init_data()?

AF_NETLINK and/or AF_PACKET might be in a similar situation
as AF_UNIX.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/