Re: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Jun 12 2006 - 04:49:38 EST



* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> (the #ifdef LOCKDEP should probably be converted to some sort of
> lockdep_split_lock_key(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock) op - i'll do that
> later)

i've added such an op, lockdep_reinit_lock_key() - this makes the patch
cleaner:

----------------------
Subject: undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

this cleans up lock-validator-special-locking-af_unix.patch: instead
of adding _bh locking to AF_UNIX, this patch splits their
sk_receive_queue.lock type from the other networking skb-queue locks.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
net/unix/garbage.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux/net/unix/af_unix.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ linux/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -542,6 +542,14 @@ static struct proto unix_proto = {
.obj_size = sizeof(struct unix_sock),
};

+/*
+ * AF_UNIX sockets do not interact with hardware, hence they
+ * dont trigger interrupts - so it's safe for them to have
+ * bh-unsafe locking for their sk_receive_queue.lock. Split off
+ * this special lock-type by reinitializing the spinlock key:
+ */
+static struct lockdep_type_key af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key;
+
static struct sock * unix_create1(struct socket *sock)
{
struct sock *sk = NULL;
@@ -557,6 +565,8 @@ static struct sock * unix_create1(struct
atomic_inc(&unix_nr_socks);

sock_init_data(sock,sk);
+ lockdep_reinit_lock_key(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock,
+ &af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key);

sk->sk_write_space = unix_write_space;
sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen;
@@ -1073,12 +1083,12 @@ restart:
unix_state_wunlock(sk);

/* take ten and and send info to listening sock */
- spin_lock_bh(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
__skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
/* Undo artificially decreased inflight after embrion
* is installed to listening socket. */
atomic_inc(&newu->inflight);
- spin_unlock_bh(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
unix_state_runlock(other);
other->sk_data_ready(other, 0);
sock_put(other);
@@ -1843,7 +1853,7 @@ static int unix_ioctl(struct socket *soc
break;
}

- spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM ||
sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
skb_queue_walk(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb)
@@ -1853,7 +1863,7 @@ static int unix_ioctl(struct socket *soc
if (skb)
amount=skb->len;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
break;
}
Index: linux/net/unix/garbage.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ linux/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
struct sock *x = pop_stack();
struct sock *sk;

- spin_lock_bh(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&x->sk_receive_queue);

/*
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
maybe_unmark_and_push(skb->sk);
skb=skb->next;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
sock_put(x);
}

@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
if (u->gc_tree == GC_ORPHAN) {
struct sk_buff *nextsk;

- spin_lock_bh(&s->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock(&s->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&s->sk_receive_queue);
while (skb &&
skb != (struct sk_buff *)&s->sk_receive_queue) {
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
}
skb = nextsk;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&s->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&s->sk_receive_queue.lock);
}
u->gc_tree = GC_ORPHAN;
}

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/