Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

[Theodore Tso]

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:53:19PM -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> > It is the lack of an ABI that is most frustrating to these users.
> 
> And the presence of an ABI would be _very_ frustrating to core
> developers. Not only would these people suffer, everyone would --
> developer time would be wasted dealing with cruft, and forward
> progress would be slowed.

Note that just because an interface is EXPORT_SYMBOL doesn't mean that
the interface is guaranteed to be stable.  So folks who are aruging
that an interface shouldn't be usable by non-GPL applications because
we are therefore guaranteeing a stable API are making an unwarranted
assumption.

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/