RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler

[Kallol Biswas]

Yes, all 3 clients run on a Redhat 9 box.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Galbraith [mailto:efault@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:13 PM
To: Kallol Biswas
Cc: Stephen Hemminger; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Radjendirane Codandaramane
Subject: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:03 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote:
> It seems that with the priority set to 19 the netserver processes do not starve but still we have unfair scheduling issue. The netperf clients do not timeout now but one of the servers runs much less than the other. It seems that thorough understanding of scheduling algorithm is essential at this point.

Are the clients all on one box?

	-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/