Re: [linux-pm] swsusp regression [Was: 2.6.17-mm1]

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:09:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> 
> > > ages.  The "bogus requests" are attempts by the user to suspend a USB
> > > device (by writing to /sys/devices/.../power/state) without first
> > > suspending all its children and interfaces.
> > > 
> > > (This can't happen when doing a global suspend because the PM core 
> > > iterates through the entire device tree.  It matters only for "runtime" or 
> > > "selective" suspend.)
> > 
> > But everything I did is:
> > echo reboot > /sys/power/disk
> > echo disk > /sys/power/state
> > 
> > No writing anywhere else.
> 
> You misunderstood.  I meant that attempts to suspend a USB device without 
> first suspending all its children and interfaces can't happen when doing a 
> global suspend.  That's still true.
> 
> Your problem occurred because even though the PM core did _attempt_ to 
> suspend the new children added by Greg's patch, it didn't _succeed_ 
> because the patch did not provide suspend or resume methods.

Which because they are virtual "devices" they do not need a suspend or
resume method, so not having any is just fine.  If we abort because of
something like this, the core logic is quite broken...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/