Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefinedreference to `__stack_chk_fail'

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Jul 03 2006 - 11:09:39 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch 7/8] inode-diet: Use a union for i_blocks and i_size,i_rdev and i_devices"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] consistently use MAX_ERRNO in __syscall_return"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Miles Lane wrote:

Well, I see that Andrew has accepted (mm5)
the -fno-stack-protector patch for the Makefile, but klibc remains
unpatched (scripts/Kbuild.klibc and usr/klibc/arch/i386/MCONFIG).
Would the right person in this dialog submit those changes to Andrew?

The fix is in my private tree, but given that we're in a merge window, I don't want to push it out right now until I've been able to figure out why an unrelated change cause make to spew warning messages.

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch 7/8] inode-diet: Use a union for i_blocks and i_size,i_rdev and i_devices"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] consistently use MAX_ERRNO in __syscall_return"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]