Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Wed Jul 12 2006 - 12:47:52 EST


Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> But uname is noticeably faster than sysctl and uname is more portable
> across linux flavors. So updating the glibc pthread code to use
> uname looks like the right way to implement is_smp_system.

This is (was?) not the universal through. We used uname at some point
but then I did some profiling and sysctl turned out to be faster.

If the reverse is true now I can certainly look into changing this but
the evidence and ideally has to be there. The simplicity of the uname
code should mean that it's faster.

In a year or two I'll remove the test anyway. By then there will likely
not be any UP kernels on reasonable machines anymore and I can drop all
the conditional code.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature