Re: RFC: kernel memory leak fix for af_unix datagram getpeersec

[David Miller]

From: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:50:40 -0400

> > diff -puN net/unix/af_unix.c~af_unix-datagram-getpeersec-ml-fix net/unix/af_unix.c
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc2/net/unix/af_unix.c~af_unix-datagram-getpeersec-ml-fix	2006-07-22 23:01:26.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2-cxzhang/net/unix/af_unix.c	2006-07-22 23:14:15.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -1323,8 +1299,9 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct kio
> >  	memcpy(UNIXCREDS(skb), &siocb->scm->creds, sizeof(struct ucred));
> >  	if (siocb->scm->fp)
> >  		unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
> > -
> > -	unix_get_peersec_dgram(skb);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
> > +	memcpy(UNIXSID(skb), &siocb->scm->sid, sizeof(u32));
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
> 
> You want to retain the static inlines, and just update their contents,
> not replace them with embedded #ifdefs.  And this could be a direct
> assignment, right?

This is my feeling too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/