[KJ] audit return code handling for kernel_thread [4/11]

[nhorman]

Audit/Cleanup of kernel_thread calls, specifically checking of return codes.
    Problems seemed to fall into 3 main categories:
    
    1) callers of kernel_thread were inconsistent about meaning of a zero return
    code.  Some callers considered a zero return code to mean success, others took
    it to mean failure.  a zero return code, while not actually possible in the
    current implementation, should be considered a success (pid 0 is/should be
    valid). fixed all callers to treat zero return as success
    
    2) caller of kernel_thread saved return code of kernel_thread for later use
    without ever checking its value.  Callers who did this tended to assume a
    non-zero return was success, and would often wait for a completion queue to be
    woken up, implying that an error (negative return code) from kernel_thread could
    lead to deadlock.  Repaired by checking return code at call time, and setting
    saved return code to zero in the event of an error.
    
    3) callers of kernel_thread never bothered to check the return code at all.
    This can lead to seemingly unrelated errors later in execution.  Fixed by
    checking return code at call time and printing a warning message on failure.

Regards
Neil
    
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


 init/do_mounts_initrd.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(void)
 
 	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
 	pid = kernel_thread(do_linuxrc, "/linuxrc", SIGCHLD);
-	if (pid > 0) {
+	if (pid >= 0) {
 		while (pid != sys_wait4(-1, NULL, 0, NULL))
 			yield();
 	}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/