Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5

[Jesper Juhl]

On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite.
> >> >
> >> Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression
> >> suite....
> >>
> > That's nice.
> >
> > Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out?
> >
> > Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode
> > is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked
> > against?" - can you comment on that?
> >
> >
> Err, how about Zam handles all locking issues and this is Sunday with
> the family?  I know, lame, but he'll answer you on Monday Russian
> time.....;-)
:-) Not a problem at all.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/