Re: [PATCH 005 of 9] md: Replace magic numbers in sb_dirty with well defined bit flags

From: Ingo Oeser
Date: Mon Jul 31 2006 - 11:31:11 EST


Hi Neil,

I think the names in this patch don't match the description at all.
May I suggest different ones?

On Monday, 31. July 2006 09:32, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Instead of magic numbers (0,1,2,3) in sb_dirty, we have
> some flags instead:
> MD_CHANGE_DEVS
> Some device state has changed requiring superblock update
> on all devices.

MD_SB_STALE or MD_SB_NEED_UPDATE

> MD_CHANGE_CLEAN
> The array has transitions from 'clean' to 'dirty' or back,
> requiring a superblock update on active devices, but possibly
> not on spares

Maybe split this into MD_SB_DIRTY and MD_SB_CLEAN ?

> MD_CHANGE_PENDING
> A superblock update is underway.

MD_SB_PENDING_UPDATE


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/