Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.orgregarding reiser4 inclusion

From: David Masover
Date: Tue Aug 01 2006 - 12:55:01 EST

Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@xxxxxx> wrote:

While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be very robust against any kind of hardware failures.

Can't have both.

Why not? I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for them being mutually exclusive? I suspect it's more "we haven't found a way yet..."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at