Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.orgregarding reiser4 inclusion
From: David Masover
Date: Tue Aug 01 2006 - 12:55:01 EST
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@xxxxxx> wrote:
While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be
very robust against any kind of hardware failures.
Can't have both.
Why not? I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for
them being mutually exclusive? I suspect it's more "we haven't found a
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/