Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tue Aug 01 2006 - 17:45:09 EST

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
That wasn't the point. The point was that bool should be a typedef to _Bool instead of an enum.

Quoting from the patch to which you are replying:

+typedef _Bool bool;

'enum' is only used for defining 'true' and 'false'.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at