IOMMU (Calgary) patches

From: Duran, Leo
Date: Thu Aug 03 2006 - 17:09:17 EST

Andi, Jon, Muli,

I'm trying to build with the latest IOMMU patches for x86_64, so, I've
pulled down 2.6.17, and the 2.6.18-rc3 patches... But, that's obviously
lagging behind a bit.

Is there a source tree that you guys work from?
(I'm hoping that there's a better mechanism than keeping track of
patches as they are submitted here).

Leo Duran.

-----Original Message-----
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:muli@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:24 AM
To: Rolf Eike Beer
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andi Kleen;
Subject: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Move valid_dma_direction() from x86_64 to
generic code

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:25:19AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:

> > ./arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:6:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./drivers/net/fec_8xx/fec_main.c:40:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h:11:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./include/asm-x86_64/swiotlb.h:5:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> I suspect it to be a bug anyway that every of this files ever included

> asm/dma-mapping.h.

Agreed wrt the fs_enet and fec_8xx; the swiotlb stuff I dimly recall I
had a reason for. I'll take a look in bit to verify akpm's fix works.

> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:27:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> This is perfectly valid, isn't it :)



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at