Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 03:25:46 EST
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:40:09 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So my take was "looks good, done deal - let's go get some sane controllers
> > working". And now this!
> My recollection from the BoF is that people felt interface wasn't a major
> issue and it wasn't discussed much. Most of the discussion centered
> around grouping of tasks and the mem/cpu controllers and some additional
> resource control requirements from openvz folks.
OK. That's certainly the area to be concentrating on.
> One way to go forward with the interface could be to request Chandra
> to repost the ckrm infrastructure and see if the stake holders (primarily
> container folks) can review and agree on it.
Fine. But let's separate that activity from the primary one: worrying
about the controllers.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/