Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - Acpu controller
From: Alan Cox
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 05:28:33 EST
Ar Iau, 2006-08-03 am 22:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
> gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code.
> I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
> this happening is low.
I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/