Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller

From: Kirill Korotaev
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 10:54:55 EST

The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
this happening is low.

I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.

Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :)
Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at