Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [6/5] enhance collistion check
From: keith mannthey
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 16:59:03 EST
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Okay... here is 6/5 patch..
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:15:50 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Maybe moving ioresouce collision check in early stage of add_memory() is good ?
> > > Yea. I am working a a full patch set for but my sparsemem and reserve
> > > add-based paths. It creates a valid_memory_add_range call at the start
> > > of add_memory. I should be posting the set in the next few hours.
> > >
> > Ah..ok. but I wrote my own patch...and testing it now..
> This patch passed test with ia64. based on 5 patches already sent.
> plz check.
Looks good to me. Tested as works x86_64. It is required for the 4th
patch of this series.
Acked-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/