Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Sat Aug 05 2006 - 09:20:51 EST
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Another idea, similar to how atime updates work in xfs currently might
be interesting: Always update atime in core, but don't start a
transaction just for it - instead only flush it when you'd do it anyway,
that is another transaction or evicting the inode.
this is sort of having a "dirty" and "dirty atime" split for the inode I suppose..
shouldn't be impossible to do with a bit of vfs support..
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/