Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86 paravirt_ops: binary patching infrastructure

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Aug 07 2006 - 01:38:19 EST

On Monday 07 August 2006 06:48, Rusty Russell wrote:

> +void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch *start, struct paravirt_patch *end)

It would be better to merge this with the existing LOCK prefix patching
or perhaps the normal alternative() patcher (is there any particular
reason you can't use it?)

Three alternative patching mechanisms just seems to be too many

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at