Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86 paravirt_ops: implementation of paravirt_ops
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Aug 07 2006 - 01:38:36 EST
On Monday 07 August 2006 06:47, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized
> instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently
> these are function implementations of native hardware: hypervisors
> will override the ops structure with their own variants.
You should call it HAL - that would make it clearer what it is.
I think I would prefer to patch always. Is there a particular
reason you can't do that?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/