Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller

From: Kirill Korotaev
Date: Mon Aug 07 2006 - 03:17:16 EST

Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect
(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)?

we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container,
objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged
correctly on free.

Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves
from one container to another.
Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes
wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether
to change the file owner or not?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at