Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with ResourceManagement - A cpu controller
From: Kirill Korotaev
Date: Mon Aug 07 2006 - 12:06:33 EST
A filesystem based interface is useful when you have hierarchies (as resource
groups and cpusets do) since it naturally defines a convenient to use
but it is not much convinient for applications then.
Is this simply a language issue? File systems hierarchies
are more easily manipulated with shell utilities (ls, cat,
find, grep, ...) and system call API's are easier to access
If so, then perhaps all that's lacking for convenient C access
to a filesystem based interface is a good library, that presents
an API convenient for use from C code, but underneath makes the
necessary file system calls (open, read, diropen, stat, ...).
file system APIs are not good for accessing attributed data.
e.g. we have a /proc which is very convenient for use from shell etc. but
is not good for applications, not fast enough etc.
moreover, /proc had always problems with locking, races and people tend to
feel like they can change text presention of data, while applications parsing
it tend to break.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/