Re: [PATCH 0/9] Replace some ARCH_HAS_XYZZY

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:15:10 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:

> 
> > They are config characteristics (in many cases).  Hiding them in
> > header files with dummy inlines or with ARCH_HAS_XYZZY is still
> > hiding them IMO, although the inlines are better than the
> > ARCH_HAS_XYZZY method.  I prefer to see them in the config space
> > since I think that's where they belong.
> 
> That's just a different way to write a #define. You could as 
> well keep the originals then.

yes, except that
1. these aren't buried in random header files
2. these are in the kconfig system & namespace where they belong

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/